Does Fascism Exist Anymore?

Across Europe and America there is a surge in support for far-right politicians which has led some to fear a resurgence in Fascism. Donald Trump in particular has been labelled a Fascist and accused of normalising Fascism in America. A book review of the rise of Hitler lead many to draw parallels with the rise of Trump (whether it was written that way or not). The night he was elected president, my article “How Fascism Takes Over” received a surge in views, receiving a months’ worth of views in two days. Some wonder if we will see a rise of Fascism across Europe.

Yet others see this as merely hysteria. Many believe that Fascism died in the Second World War, that the age of uniformed thugs attacking Jews no longer exists. That Fascism is a mere insult that has lost all meaning. That to worry about Fascism is to cry wolf and nothing more than an attempt to smear your opponents. So does Fascism still exist?

While Fascist is certainly overused as an insult, this does not mean it is useless as a term. After all, Socialist and Communist are common insults yet they are still useful descriptive terms. There is hardly any political term that has not been misused (liberal can mean almost anything), so if we ignore those that have been, we have nothing to work with.

Let’s begin by collecting the common features of Fascist political movements in the 1930s. I’ll focus on the rise of Fascism, rather than when they were in power as there are more examples and it’s more relevant. It’s worth noting that there were many differences between the various national movements depending on local circumstances, so some features were more present than other others. Also within parties there would be various factions that emphasised some policies over others.

Fascist parties generally were contradictory and often lacked clear policies, for example many tried to appeal to both anti-capitalists and capitalists at the same time. They were modernist movements yet also glorified the past. In opposition they often defended religion, but in power saw it as a challenge to their authority. They were very vague on their policies, preferring to rely instead on the belief that a strong leader would solve the problems. They were often clearer on what they opposed than what they supported.

That being said, here are some of the core features of Fascism in the 1930s:

  • Extremely Nationalistic
  • Militaristic (war was glorified)
  • Paramilitary wing (uniforms, salutes, flags etc)
  • Political violence
  • Cult of personality, one strong leader to solve the problems
  • Macho male culture
  • Anti-establishment
  • Anti-democratic
  • Vague policies
  • Anti-communist
  • Anti-Semitic
  • Glorified image of the past
  • Opposition to modern decadence
  • Defender of the Faith

Looking at the list, we can see some features that have continued to this day and some that have not. The most obvious one is that no political movement nowadays wears uniforms or uses salutes (they are illegal in many countries). The political violence of the 1930s (where political rallies would frequently end in fights) is unknown today. While some politicians show disregard for features of democracy by threatening the media or threatening to imprison their opponents, they do not aim to abolish democracy itself. Communism is no longer a major political force and anti-Semitism has been discredited.

But before we conclude that Fascism no longer exists, we must remember that the environment of 2016 is completely different to that of 1936. Our society, culture and economy has completely changed since then so it doesn’t make any sense to expect political movements not to change with the times. After all, if we examined Conservative parties in 1936, we would find few features that exist in modern parties, yet that does not mean that Conservativism no longer exists. If we focus on the common core belief, such as smaller government influence on the market and traditional social values (however that may be defined) then we can see a continuous link between the past and the present.

Fascism was greatly shaped by the issues of the time, namely the First World War, the Russian Revolution and the Great Depression. The War caused enormous shock to society and made many question traditional values. It legitimised violence to achieve political aims and created a sense of national resentment that war sacrifices were not rewarded in peacetime. The Bolshevik Revolution and other revolutions across Europe led to a major fear of a Communist takeover. The Depression also undermined the political establishment and left many people desperate for change. Democracy too was weak and instable having only recently being introduced (often the states themselves had only recently been created).

In contrast, democracy is much firmer and deeply rooted in modern society. As a result, there is far less anti-democratic sentiment, even among the far-right. These movements are by and large committed to attaining power through democratic political means. There is no equivalent to the First World War and as a result, there is less glorification of violence and militarisation. Communism has collapsed as a world power and Communist parties barely exist in most countries. The only possible similarity is the Great Recession which has certainly undermined support for the political system and provoked a large amount of anger.

So as society and the political climate has changed, so too has Fascism. Another major change is the rise of mass immigration. There are many new ethnicities that may have never before lived in the country. A new fear is that the present ethnic majority will no longer have sole control over the country and may even become a minority. In many ways, Muslims have replaced Jews as the bogeyman that can be blamed for the problems of society. They have also replaced Communists as the main villains who are allegedly plotting to overthrow the state and impose Sharia Law. Islam is the new international menace that can strike anywhere, the new enemy within.

Yet many of the core elements of Fascism are still present. They are still extremely nationalist, hostile to ethnic or religious minorities, believe in a strong leader, oppose modern decadence and wish to return to the glory days of the past. For example, a common target is “political correctness” which while being a relatively new term, is similar to the old claim that this generation was too soft and the country needed was a tough leader who will do and say what needs to be done. They still view themselves as defenders of the Christian faith and heritage against non-believers. Protecting the purity of the race and the strength of the ethnic majority are still major concerns even if expressed in modern terms. Militarism is not as strong, although a war on Islam is still a core policy. There is still a lot of ambiguity about how they will achieve their policies, generally preferring to attack the establishment rather than provide an alternative.


So while the Fascism of the 1930s is gone, many elements of it linger on in what I call “New Fascism” (which you could also call “Neo-Fascism” or “Second-Wave Fascism”). Here are some of the core elements:

  • Extremely Nationalistic
  • Desire for a strong leader
  • Anti-Islamic
  • Anti-immigration
  • Support a return to past glories
  • Oppose modern decadence and political correctness
  • Anti-establishment
  • Vague or non-existent policies
  • Defender of the Faith
  • Macho male culture

So yes, Fascism still exists. Using this definition, most European countries political parties in their parliament that count as New Fascist (Ireland thankfully does not, at least for now). So while some see Fascism as merely an overused insult or as a black and white photo of soldiers marching or thugs beating up minorities, it is still a real and existing ideology. Across the West, there are millions of people who vote for New Fascists, some of whom have come close to winning the Presidency. The American election (and others) have shown the dangers of downplaying or ignoring extreme opinions. They may not be often publically expressed, but that doesn’t mean they don’t exist.

The challenge from New Fascists cannot be ignored and could decide the shape of future political debate. Perhaps this decade or even this generation, will be judged on how we deal with the rise of New Fascism.

20 thoughts on “Does Fascism Exist Anymore?”

  1. My view is that there is a danger of fascism rising again to the point that it causes very real and very serious issues within Europe and it’s neighbours. I’m not prepared to say the result will be a war, but do think there will be negative economic effects.

    Looking at some of the rhetoric over Britain’s exit from the EU is enough to cause alarm. People are sending death threats to judges and politicians who are involved in the process and trying to make sure that the correct legal statutes are followed. If they’re prepared to do that, then who knows what they’re prepared to do and say to foreign nationals that they dislike or disagree with.

    I don’t like that there are people who now feel emboldened to publically voice such vileness and worse still, their views are normalised in some quarters which results in those looking for harmony being labelled as the bigots. Really! It’s that latter bit that makes me concerned.

  2. I’m not sure what you mean by “anti-semitism has been discredited”. Wherever Muslims are not perceived as a threat (such as in Muslim countries), Jews are often still at the top of the enemies list. Luckily, those countries had generally already expelled nearly all Jews from their territory in 1940s and 1950s, and the First World is currently more obsessed with Muslims, so there is a little chance of another continent-wide extermination of Jews in the near future.
    However, even in the United States there are significantly more religiously-motivated attacks against Jews than against Muslims or any other religious minority, according to the FBI data. And I wouldn’t be surprised if the same tendency exists in European countries. So maybe anti-Semitism is less common and less tolerated now than 75 years ago, but it’s not gone and not going anywhere.

    1. I’d have to disagree. The far-right immigrants focus far more on Muslims, especially Muslim immigrants, probably because there are more of them. I’ve seen an enormous number of online discussion about the dangers Muslims cause, yet comparatively little about Jews. For example, there are politicians across Europe who want to limit Muslim immigration, yet I know of none who want to limit the number of Jews in the country.

      1. Maybe one reason why the far-right politicians don’t care about the numbers of Jews is because more Jews are leaving Europe than coming to Europe. And, of course, the right-wingers fear Muslims much more than they don’t like Jews, on this we can agree. Yet the fact that there is a strong anti-Muslim xenophobia doesn’t mean no other type of xenophobia could exist at the same time – even during the Holocaust, the Nazis were exterminating the Roma people and gays along with Jews.
        And if you don’t think there’s any anti-semitism in the West, you might want to google “anti-semitic attacks in Europe”. Online discussion are not always an accurate representation of reality. (Which I just stated in an online discussion 🙂 )

      2. If you accept the idea that the mantle of fascism in the US has been taken up largely (but not entirely) by Christian Evangelicals, you might better understand the nuanced place Judaism has taken in some circles of American alt-right ideology. One line of thinking is the Christian embrace of “End of Times” theology and the prophesied necessity of an established state of Israel before the messiah’s return. Jews are supposed to help pave the Saviors way by converting en masse. Throughout the millennia, some Christians have become rather impatient; their frustrations sowing the criminal seeds of anti-semitism, especially in central Europe. But currently, Christians are directing their frustrations elsewhere which provides a useful segue into the second consideration: to claim an affection for Jews and Israel is a quick and dirty way to say “See? I’m not a nazi” despite possessing all the above core elements.

        1. the mantle of fascism in the US has been taken up largely (but not entirely) by Christian Evangelicals…based on what evidence?

    1. Did you ever stop and ask yourself if maybe anyone on the right does the same actions you complain about? Or do extremists only exist on the left?

      Also saying that antifa is acting the same as the Nazis is ridiculous and absurd.

      1. No, I also believe people on the right can and do the same things as those on the left, there just don’t seem to be as many at this time. When I have enough examples I will probably make another post.

        Did you read my post or just the title? Because I gave clear examples of them acting the same as the Nazi party, I backed up my points with facts and evidence and not just my opinion.

          1. You may have just single handedly described quite possibly every written argument in existence.
            My post was this “I believe that Antifa are showing signs of fascism, here is the evidence that backs it up,” I didn’t include evidence that disputed the argument for the simple fact that it appears none exist. If you can find evidence that disputes my argument then I implore you to show it to me, that way I can examine it and update my own views and my argument as a result.
            My examples were showing that many hate crimes have been made up or misrepresented by the media, my point being that any supposed surge in hate crimes didn’t actually exist and that the level of confirmed hate crimes had not gone up, and so there is no justification for an increasingly violent response.
            Instead of disputing my claims with facts and evidence your response was to call them ‘ridiculous and absurd’ without justification. That is not the way to win an argument nor to change peoples views.

  3. At this point there is nothing alt-right or “new” about it. It’s just fascism and is useful to describe it as such. Because the vast majority of that list up there either applies to Donald Trump or his base.

    Extremely Nationalistic:
    Yes. MAGA. He also keeps posturing for a more isolationistic stance and forcing NATO to “pay up.” And has made no secret that he wants to “put American first.”

    Militaristic (war was glorified):
    Yes. Trump keeps wanting to expand the military budget and wanted a military parade for his inauguration. The DoD told him he couldn’t have it because it’d tear up the roads in DC.

    Paramilitary wing (uniforms, salutes, flags etc):
    Applies to the alt-right. White supremacists infiltrating law enforcement was a known problem. ICE basically was ready to enact Trump’s deportation scheme and Bannon basically dreams. White supremacists love the idea of being the SS.

    Political violence:
    No. But I attribute that more to the relative political stability of the American political system. I have no doubt some lunatics would like to do nothing more than lynch Obama or Hillary based on no evidence whatsoever.

    Cult of personality, one strong leader to solve the problems:
    Yes. Trump is an authoritarian leader how is hailed as a “great businessman” and “negotiator” and Republicans have repeatedly demonized liberals as being weak bleeding hearts who lack the fortitude to do what needs doing.

    Macho male culture:
    Yes. The alt-right and white supremacists are regularly in the “when men where men and women were women” camp.
    A lot of modern toxic masculinity lies squarely in the alt-right camp and has a lot of overlap with the pickup artist culture and other garbage like “ladder theory.”

    Yes, a part of Trump’s base would love nothing more than to get rid of government all together. Part of the motivation for voting Trump is that he’s seen as a method of destroying a corrupt establishment.

    Republicans in a nutshell. Plus possible ties to Russia.

    Vague policies:
    Definitely yes. Trump doesn’t care about policy. He just expects his toadies to sort things out for him.

    This does not apply to Trump specifically, but his base regularly complains about “cultural Marxists” and basically assume all liberals are communists ala McCarthyism. Actual fascsists don’t believe that “antifas” are anything but communists.

    Applies to Trump’s base to one degree or another.
    Putting aside the Trump himself is basically the man who isn’t racist because he has, like, a Jewish friend.

    Glorified image of the past:
    The alt-right is the very image of this. Same with white supremacists. A lot of talk about the economy centers around the romanticized image of the coal miner or factory worker who represents hard work and self sufficiency.

    Opposition to modern decadence:
    Same as above. Conservatism in America either believes it represents the “moral majority” or the champion of “family values” and that opening the gates to gay marriage or LBGT rights basically represents modern decadence. Cities are also regularly demonized as being hot beds of crime. (See Trump talking about Chicago.) And there’s no question that there’s a political divide between rural and urban.

    Defender of the Faith:
    Not really. Trump is rather irreligious. But this doesn’t apply to his base who might choose to see him that way out of ignorance.

    Fascism is very much alive. It just turns out the disparate qualities of fascism like to glom onto each other to gain political momentum. Most of the list boils down to: Authoritarian elements who just really love simplistic aggression and demonization of outgroups who must be expunged.

    1. I meant to expand on anti-democratic.
      There’s nothing democratic about the Republican party, as they are the perpetrators of gerrymandering, corporate lobbying culture and restrictive voter laws. They simply have no mandate.

  4. This article is ridiculous. Calling on all the prejudice they can with the garbage written about macho male groups being automatically Fascist blah blah. Like all black people are criminals hey. I find this article obtuse to what we call being educated and possessing an open mind. Fascism has all the positive qualities that are required to run a state for the benefit of its people. It would challenge the traditional money supply which is where the anti-Semitism idea comes in, it would challenge foreign ownership, it would naturally protect its own religion against others. The Fascists of WW2 started their regimes with our Western support and it was only until they were all drunk with power and wanted world domination at any cost that it went belly up. Many Fascist economic policies would allow the state to regain its method of production, that is an enemy to globalism. The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is ye olde Fascism personified and we support them. Anti-fascism is simply neo left posh white female students shouting down white men with tattoos who don’t have the eloquence to convey their actual argument over the application of law being different depending on your deity.

  5. By and large? Nope. A little bit yes, certain individuals, small groups. But on a large scale? Not really in the developed world. Which makes such and Antifa, in first world countries seem rather redundant, and given how they behave, perhaps should be reigned in a little more than they are. But it won’t happen.

    How about this though, the extremes of both sides should fight it out… Gladiator style!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: