The Case For Capital Controls

The standard economic view used to be that capital controls were a damaging relic from the past. Almost all economists opposed them as they believed they discouraged foreign investment, created barriers to trade and lead to an inefficient allocation of resources. The notion that the government could restrict how people used their money was found abhorrent by many. However, since the Financial Crisis, there has been a shift in opinions. Many economists support some capital controls to reduce instability in the economy, particularly in the financial sector. 250 economists from around the world signed a petition calling on the US government to reconsider its opposition to capital controls. Even major institutions like the IMF, the World Bank, the Federal Reserve and the European Union have admitted that there may be some cases in which capital controls are beneficial. Continue reading “The Case For Capital Controls”

The Fool’s Gold Standard

Having money linked to a Gold Standard is an idea that almost every economist opposes. It is described as the economic equivalent of creationism and a major cause of the Great Depression. It is ignored by policymakers and no country has one anymore. Yet there is some support for it on the internet. It is one of Ron Paul’s main ideas in his campaign for the Presidency and is supported to some extent by Paul Ryan. The Republican platform promises a commission to consider reintroducing it. So what is a Gold Standard and why is it so bad? Continue reading “The Fool’s Gold Standard”